Conference Policies

Peer Review Process

standardization of evaluation: Once the article is submitted, it goes through a standardization of assessment process (number of characters counting, shapes quotes, activated links, correct completion of metadata, quality check of tables and figures and check withdrawal authorship of IDs). Having corrections, will be requested from the author who will have a maximum period of 15 days to make the necessary adjustments and submit them for evaluation of merit.
merit evaluation: After the evaluation standards, the article is submitted to peer body ad hoc, which will enjoy watching the double blind system. The opinions options are: "Approved for publication", "Rejected for publication" and "necessary adjustments". If there is divergence in opinions, the editors refer the article to the editorial board for the tie.

 

Archive Access Policy

 

Science and Computer Science In Sports

Quadrennial Congress of the IACCS